Suspension Threadlifting
Gary
D. Monheit, M.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Dermatology
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama
Introduction
Rejuvenation of the aging face involves modalities that will refill,
resurface, relax and resuspend. As cosmetic rejuvenation procedures
have become simpler and less aggressive, downtime has decreased and
safety has increased. Most facial rejuvenation involves a combination
of procedures that can be tailored to the needs of the patient. Suspension
threadlifting provides a less invasive method for resuspending the aging
face. Both here in the United States and abroad, the most recent minimally
invasive lifting technique has been the barbed threads used for suspension.
The Aptos subdermal suspension threads evolved from the concept of skin
and fascia adhering to the barbed suture, creating elevation. This was
developed by Marlen and George Sulamanidze in Russia. Concomitantly,
the barbed suture or Contour Thread developed by Dr. Greg Ruff at Duke
University and in the United States is now FDA approved and used as
a similar unidirectional barbed suspension thread.
Mechanism of Action
Aptos is derived from the Greek “Anti” plus “Ptosis”.
It is a barbed thread that adheres to the dermis and acts as a gathering
stitch. The Aptos thread is based on the concept that the skin can be
lifted and held in a suspended position with barbs alone without affecting
the underlying muscle or bone. The barbed adherence is performed without
suturing or anchoring to fascia muscle or bone. The thread itself is
a polypropylene suture with barbed incisions in two directions. The
bidirectional barbs hold tissue in both inferior and superior direction,
giving greater adherence.
Greg Ruff, M.D. has independently developed a different concept of barbed
suture for facial suspension. Having used the model of the porcupine
quill (erethizon dursaton) as a multi-barbed suture that maintains a
hold or grasp on soft tissue through an even and spiral diffusion of
barbs on each quill, Dr. Ruff began work on the “quill suture”
in the early 90’s as a closure technique for surgical wounds.
It was found to be self-anchoring with no knots, giving a faster and
more efficient closure with tension broadly distributed. The “Contour
Suture” was thus developed as a unidirectional barbed monofilament
suture with a different pattern of insertion and anchored superiorly
to a fixed structure. (Figure 1)
Safety and Efficacy
Marlen Sulamanidze developed the Aptos thread in the 90’s. At
present, it is not an approved device in the US. Animal studies revealed
the non-inflammatory status of the non-barbed praline suture while the
barbed areas developed a fibrotic cuff over a period of 3 months. It
is this fibrous sheath which theoretically holds the tissue in place.
For Contour
Threads, data has been obtained as to tensile strength, tissue stretch
and histologic studies of fibroblast migration and collagen development.
The studies demonstrated the thread to be a safe and reliable technique
for facial suspension. In 2005, the FDA has approved it for suture suspension
for cheeks, jowls and brow. The procedure itself is performed under
local anesthesia as an outpatient with minimal trauma and thus little
bruising and erythmosas with little resultant downtime. Potential complications,
though, can include asymmetry, visible threads, suture spitting, post-operative
pain, infection, and correction destroyed by manipulation.
Indications
The Aptos thread is not an approved device in the US. In 2005, the FDA
approved Contour Threads for suture suspension of the cheeks, jowls
and brow.
Proper Patient Selection
The patients who benefit most from threadlifting procedures are patients
with some ptosis of the cheeks, jowls and brow, but not a lot of excess
sagging skin. Also, heavyset patients are less likely to obtain optimal
results due to destruction of correction by stretching and release of
the barbs on the suture. The procedure can be combined well with other
minimally invasive procedures such as skin and soft tissue filling agents
and botulinim toxin.
Contraindications
The use of blood thinners increases risk of postoperative bruising but
is not an absolute contraindication. Patients with active skin infection
should be fully treated prior to thread placement. Also, patients with
unrealistic expectations should be excluded. Patients should understand
that this is not a face lift and thus more radical lifting and correction
cannot be achieved.
Pre-Procedure Patient Education
Patients are educated on the risks and benefits of threadlifting. They
are shown before, during, and after photographs of previously treated
patients so that they can better understand the process involved in
recovery after the lifting procedure. They are told that the threadlift
procedure is not a substitute for a facelift, but rather a less invasive
alternative that will provide some correction of ptosis but not to the
degree of a facelift. The patient must understand that there is a period
of “downtime” in which excessive pressure or movement may
break the barb-hold on the elevated skin and destroy correction. There
are also temporary folds, dimples and furrows where the skin is abnormally
tight which will correct over 3 weeks as the threads commonly lose 20%
of pulled correction. In addition, long-term expectations are discussed
with the patient including the possibility that over time the correction
will diminish. Patient questions should also be answered.
Procedure Protocol
Tray Set-Up
The tray used for insertion of threads for both Aptos Threads and Contour
Threads is a standard excision tray with a needle holder, forceps, scalpel
(with a number 11 or 15 blade), suture scissors, Gradle scissors (or
similar) for undermining, gauze, a small bowl of saline, and the appropriate
threads. For Aptos Threads, a 20 gauge spinal needle is also needed.
For Contour Threads, an undermining needle may be used. (Table 1)
Procedure
1) A map of vectors is drawn on the patient’s face in a seated
position to determine the pathways of the threads and the number of
threads needed to obtain the necessary elevation. For Aptos threads
the pathways are drawn along the appropriate vectors and do not need
to connect in the scalp (Figure 2). Unlike the Aptos threads, Contour
Threads are used in pairs with the pathways ascending superiorly to
a pointed V in the temporal scalp (Figure 3).
2) The patient’s face is cleansed and sterilized with an appropriate
surgical scrub so that the procedure can be performed sterily.
3) Although the procedure can be performed with local anesthesia alone,
minimal anxiolytic sedation (diazepam 5-10 mg sublingually to supplement
the local anesthesia alone) is often advisable. 1% lidocaine with 1:150,000
epinephrine with bicarbonate is used to infiltrate the skin and subcutaneous
pathway. One can use a 1 ½ inch 30 gauge needle and 10 cc syringe
producing first a bleb intradermally at the point of insertion, then
a subcutaneous infiltration of the suture pathway. This can easily be
performed with a 20 gauge spiral needle. This usually produces enough
anesthesia for painless placement of the suspension suture.
4a) For Aptos Threads: A 20 gauge spinal needle –
trochar in place – is introduced through the skin and advanced
along the mapped pathway with a “serpiginous” pattern. This
is to increase the tissue area of barbed contact and the changing of
direction creates a stronger barbed attachment. The needle is advanced
to its termination at the nasolabial fold and exited to the skin. The
trochar is removed and the barbed suture introduced into the spinal
needle from the termination point to the beginning. The inferior portion
of protruding thread is clamped with a hemostat for security as the
spinal needle is removed. At the same time, the cheek is compressed
upward. After the needle is removed superiorly, the thread is pulled
in both directions, opening the barb and holding the skin in its upward
compressed position. The two sides are then compared for symmetry and
even correction. At this time, change can be made to equal the elevation
and create a natural lifting. The protruding sutures are then snipped
with suture scissors and the suture tucked in to the subcutaneous tissue.
4b) For Contour Threads: There are 2 suture types available
for use. The CT-200 I is a 25 cm. 2-0 polypropylene barbed suture which
is swagged onto a 7 inch straight needle with a tapered cutting tip
and 26 mm. ½ circle tapered needle on the opposite end for suture
fixation. At the superior point in the temporal scalp, the fixation
needle is used to anchor the suture in the temporal fascia. The CT-200
is the first suture developed and commonly used now for neck lifting.
The CT 400 suture has paired barbed sutures with 2 straight taper-cut
needles attached together with non-barbed portion of 3-0 proline suture.
The paired insertion thus does not require suturing the 2 barbed sections
together but does require passage to deep fascia superiorly for fixation.
Like the Aptos threads, an initial incision is made superiorly and the
straight needle threaded through the subcutaneous tissue in a serpentine
pattern (Figure 4). Each pair of threads is sutured into the superior
temporal fascia. In some patients an additional incision can be made
in between the threads and also on either side near the insertion point
in the temporalis fascia. A small undermining needle can then be inserted
and used to free the surrounding tissue to allow for a more plate-like
lift. As the threads are pulled downward, the cheek then can be massaged
upward into proper position. The lift can be adjusted for symmetry and
a natural appearance with the patient awake, in a seated position, checking
for approval and satisfaction. The protruding sutures are then snipped
with suture scissors and the suture tucked in to the subcutaneous tissue.
5) Antibiotic ointment is placed over the needle holes and steri-strips
or micropore tape is placed over the cheeks for surface anti-tension
suspension (Figure 5).
Post Procedure Instructions
Post-operatively, the patient is warned against excessive cheek or moderate
mouth movement that, early on, can break the correction. Also, the patient
is advised against massage or aggressively scraping the cheeks for the
first few days which can also dislodge the barbs. The tape is left in
place for the first few days and patients are also advised to sleep
propped up and stabilized to prevent rolling over and dislodging the
barbs from sleep compression. In a majority of patients, the correction
is well maintained if the early postoperative care is followed. 0.25%
Acetic acid soaks are used everyday and polysporin is applied to suture
insertion points.
Recommendations for Follow-Up
Patients return 3 to 7 days post-procedure for minor corrections of
dimpling and asymmetry. Care must be taken to not undo too much of the
correction because 25-35% of the correction will relax with time and
most dimples will resolve with tincture of time. It is important to
reassure patients in the early stages of recovery because their appearance
is often quite pulled.
Complications
As discussed in the safety and efficacy section, complications seen
include asymmetry, visible threads, suture spitting, post-operative
pain, infection, and correction destroyed by manipulation. Pre and postoperative
photographs are important with threadlifting procedures. Often patients
have degrees of natural facial asymmetry that were not apparent to them
preoperatively. In the early postoperative period it is easy to release
some of the barbs and decrease the amount of lift to improve symmetry.
Threads may be visible early on, especially in the patient who has thin
skin and little subcutaneous tissue. This usually improves with time.
If it persists to the patient’s dissatisfaction after three or
four weeks, the barbed suture can be removed. In addition, if threads
are placed too superficially they often remain visible. Care must be
taken intraoperatively to insure the threads are placed in the appropriate
subcutaneous plane.
Suture migration or spitting at the surface has been seen. The protruding
suture can be easily snipped or a wandering suture removed. One of the
most common complaints is a firm papule at the insertion point of a
Contour Thread. Occasionally the tail end of the thread needs to be
trimmed closure to the knot to avoid this complication.
Infection is rare, especially with pre-operative antibiotics. Precautions
of asepsis and sterility should prevent this.
The patient may complain of a pinching pain. This may be due to a barb
irritating a peripheral nerve. This usually occurs within the first
week and subsides. The patient needs reassurance and this is usually
all that is necessary; though, if it persists and creates a symptomatic
problem, the suture may be removed. True neurasthenia or prolonged motor
nerve injury is rare but theoretically can occur, especially in the
temporal and mandibular area where the facial nerve is most superficial.
The most common important adverse sequelae is the destruction of correction
by releasing the barbs. Correct technique of insertion – using
a serpentine pattern – along with proper post-operative protection
can guard against this problem. Patients need to be aware that manipulation
of the face in the early postoperative period can completely undo their
lift. Manipulation includes the use of makeup, vigorous massage or face
washing or rolling over in their sleep. If the lift is undone, additional
threads will have to be placed.
Pearls
Patient selection and preoperative education make a huge difference
in outcomes. Patients need to understand that the procedure does involve
some postoperative downtime and that the true result is not apparent
immediately. For physicians, this means resisting the urge to release
every dimple and pull on the skin as the end lift will be significantly
decreased. Also, patients who need facelifts are not good candidates
for threadlifting.
Pitfalls
Failing to insert the suture in a serpiginous pattern will lessen the
likelihood of a long-term lift.
Failing to obtain preoperative photographs will make it difficult to
assess postoperative lift and symmetry.
Table 1. CONTOUR
THREADS TRAY SET-UP
SUPPLY
• Contour Threads
• Mohs’ Pack (includes sterile towels, 2x2s, 4x4s, cotton
tipped applicators)
• Mohs’ Instruments (includes scalpel handle, needle holder,
Iris scissors, Gradle scissors, Bishop-Harmon or Castroviejo forceps,
skin hooks, and Brown-Adson forceps)
• Purple marking pen
• Sterile Saline in large cup
• Number #15 Blade x2
• x1 25 gauge Spinal Needle
• Ultradex Scrub Brush to prep patient’s face and hairline
• Appropriate size sterile gloves
LOCAL ANESTHESIA
• x4 or more 3cc Syringes of Lidocaine with SB (8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate)
• x4 or more 5cc Syringes with Lidocaine with Epinephrine
• 30 gauge ½ inch needle
MEDICATIONS:
Take or Written Verbal Orders from Physician
Table 2. Procedure Checklist
? Preoperative photographs including a frontal view of the entire face,
side views taken at 90? and 45? from each side
? Informed Consent
? Mapping of thread pathways while patient is sitting upright
? Injection of thread tracts with local anesthesia (generally 1% lidocaine
with epinephrine)
? Confirmation of the number of threads needed
? Insertion of the threads and contouring
? Post-operative instructions and follow-up appointment given
? Procedure note documented in chart
Table 3. Sample
Procedure Note
The patient received a fully informed consultation and consent prior
to surgery and photographs were taken. The patient approved of an outline
of ___________ threads on either side to elevate ________________________.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE: The pathways for the cogged threads were
outlined with a gentian violet marking pen and the entire face was prepped
with ________________ and draped sterily. _____________ cc’s of
____________________ was injected along the pathway on ___________________.
The needle thread was inserted into the temporal subcutaneous tissue
and advanced serpiginously to the exit point along the nasolabial fold,
the oral commissure and the lower cheeks. The cogged thread was inserted
and advanced fully. The needle was then extracted with cheek elevation.
______________ threads were placed on each _________________ and a similar
pattern was used along the retroauricular neck and the medial neck area
bilaterally. The tips of the suture were then clipped and the suture
end was pushed back in the subcutaneous tissue.
The patient tolerated
the procedure well and left the operating room in stable condition and
will be discharged home.